Home  

   
 
 

Microhelp


I think I used my first PC about 20 years ago, and I have been online since 1993. I must have bought half a dozen computers over the years. 

I remember vividly the first time I "lost" a file which I had forgotten to back up early enough (it was a 14-page long end-of-semester school paper, and I managed to kick the power plug off the wall all by myself...) I remember the hours I spent (including this very afternoon), usually on my own nickel calling, customer support staff - usually to no avail whatsoever.

In a nutshell, like most of us I have mixed feelings : I couldn't live without a computer (well, I guess I could but you get my drift), but at the same time I find this Microsoft-enabled world of ours immensely frustrating, or even downright distressing. 

What is this about then ? 

Over the years, I have looked into possible solutions to this problem. Will it ever be possible to offer efficient (from the user's perspective) tech support ? I have decided to share with you my questions, my (or others'...) experiences, and my ideas.

Please note that this is not a support group (as I am afraid I usually need more help than I can provide) but rather just another blog - and I welcome your thoughts.

February 25, 2003 11:22pm

FTP publishing - why is it so "un-user-friendly" ?

I have just spent the last two hours trying (unsuccessfully) to upload a Blogger file on my site. Why is it so complicated ? Surfing on the Web, I got the confimation that 90% of the problems people have in identical circumstances is with "pathing" issues. Useful to know ! I even found a Blogger help file on this subject. But to no avail. I am sure I will find a way when I take the time to talk to host provider (more on this later, surely). But, again, why is it so complicated - or rather, so "un-user-friendly" ? How are average web users expected to use the Internet as an everyday (publishing) tool if such as simple thing as uploading a file is so tough ? 

February 24, 2003 9:07pm

Describing the problem

One of the first hurdle faced by computer users is how to describe the problem they’re facing. Usually, they get an error message – which they do not understand, and often forget to write down. Why not try and enable applications to open their own trouble tickets when something goes awry ? In essence, Microsoft has already implemented this concept in IE – which sends a message “home” after the browser has encountered a problem. It could be done by a spy software-like software which would log all Windows-generated error messages and make the log available remotely to helpdesk operators – saving them and their customers time and money. Computer Associates, Hewlett-Packard, IBM/Tivoli, and BMC are looking to incorporate such a feature in their corporate Web services offerings. Eventually, applications will be able to consult directly with a web-based service to understand the immediate problem, check the customer’s SLA standing, and suggest what action should be taken. When will that be made that available to Soho and home users ?

 

Top >

 

 

 

The roots of the problem

Unless we're techies (and even then...) most of us are lost when it comes to the intricacies of the technology that underpins most of the tools we use everyday.

Assumptions 

On the job, where IT is part of the package, we always assume somebody will be there whose job it is to take care of the problems.  At home (or in a SOHO environnement) it's different. When a problem arises, the whole thing becomes pretty emotional. Worry sets in, the next door computer whiz kid (or son, or brother in my case) is called to the rescue. Or you call tech support from whoever sold you whatever doesn't work. Which is where the nightmare begins. Because most IT or software vendors (or ISPs) don't really care, and the poor folks on the phone aren't up to it.

This situation is bound to get worse as technology gets more complicated. Bill Gates says he is going to make things easier for us : but to make things easier to use, one has to complicate the underlying technology : so when it goes down, there's really nothing anybody can do about it. Well, sort of.

Don't expect too much...

However, from a consumer's perspective, one would assume that vendors (or service providers) should provide the appropriate (effective) level of support when something goes wrong. The idea being that you've paid for that support when you bought the box. But that would be too simple ... 

As it turns out, calls to tech support lines always (well, 9 times out of ten) turn out to be frustrating experiences, boiling down to "Now that we have ticked all the boxes in the manual, please switch the machine off - or reinstall the software". Great. I hate paying 30 cents a minute to help an incompetent (and not always friendly) young person try to help me deal with a situation they don't understand and have no (real) idea how to put right. Don't you ?

Why ?

I can see two reasons for this state of fact. 

Firstly, an "inception" problem. New product managers are usually being held hostage by the techies who devise the tools. Marketing people come up with a concept, and they write a set of specifications. Then, techies take over and start working away - their way, which doesn't involve taking into account how 'real' people (read 'non-technically minded', average you an me) will actually interact with those tools. When the product is tested, things aren't usually right - I mean from a non-techie point of view. But it is too late to make any significant changes, and/or it would cost too much money. So product managers go along, hoping that marketing and tech support will alleviate the problems in the end. Usually, it doesn't work that way, though. 

Then a hard business reason : vendors make their money selling the box. Their margin is in that box : so one shouldn't expect them to invest too much money in after sale service - well, that's what a senior Compaq UK marketing person (in charge of tech support...) told me, and it makes sense... 

 


 

 

 

Copyright © 2003 Pierre Guillery Mediation